Covid-19: All Lies. All Crime
Part 6: Manipulating the Death Rate Data
Manipulating the Death Rate Data
If you have studiously ploughed through all the facts and figures so far, you must be wondering how on earth Western governments got away with the colossal fraud entailed in persuading us that Covid-19 deaths were enormously high throughout 2020. Ditto, that we were all equally threatened with death if we disobeyed the various ludicrous and tyrannical edicts crashing down upon us from the political, media, scientific and medical establishments.
What they did was actually very simple. Beautifully simple, in fact. They just applied the label of “Covid-19 death” to perfectly natural and normal deaths of the old and the ill, along with the deaths by terminally unfortunate accident of the young and the healthy.
Before PCR Testing became the norm, doctors were advised – without the actual necessity of looking at the recently departed – to label the death as a Covid-19 death if the deceased had shown any symptoms of Covid-19 such as breathlessness, fever, cough, cold etc. Needless to say, most old and ill people who die exhibit many of those symptoms.
After the PCR Testing regime became the norm, all deaths were labelled as Covid-19 if the deceased had tested PCR Positive. This included those who were dying from cancer, heart disease, stage-4 kidney disease etc. Mr X actually died of cancer, but Covid-19 was the label attributed to his death, simply because he had tested PCR positive two months earlier.
Even worse, a perfectly healthy twenty-one-year-old who died in a motorcycle accident was labelled a Covid-19 death if he had tested PCR positive three months previously. The government took some stick over this obviously fraudulent manipulation of mortality data, and decided to become less fraudulently insane by stating the PCR Positive Test must have taken place within twenty-eight days of the death.
This lessened the distortion to a degree, but nonetheless a fit and healthy twenty-five-year-old who died in a para-gliding accident was still labelled a Covid-19 death if he had tested positive at any point over the twenty-eight days between PCR test and para-glider plummet. All of this was criminally fraudulent, obviously, but it laid the groundwork for even more criminal insanity with regard to the future vaccines.
I don’t want to get into the whole vaccine issue in this article, but bear the following in mind: Fit and healthy thirty-year-old Mr Y was injected with the mRNA vaccine on Jan 1st, 2022. A few days later he felt a bit iffy and toddled along for a PCR test on January 5th which returned a positive result. On January 15th 2022, poor old Mr Y suffered a heart attack whilst cycling and was pronounced dead at the scene.
The cause of death was listed as Covid-19. His family protested and said he had been feeling perfectly OK up to the date of the mRNA vaccine injection. Could the vaccine be responsible for his death, they asked the doctor. Of course not, she scoffed. Mr Y was technically unvaccinated, you see.
How is this possible? Western governments decreed it takes some days for mRNA vaccines to work – for them to be effective. So, a fourteen-day duration was put in place to allow for the delayed efficiency and/or nasty side effects following vaccination. If a person died thirteen days post vaccination, he/she was deemed technically unvaccinated.
Had they tested PCR positive within twenty-eight days from PCR positive test to heart attack whilst cycling however, they died from Covid-19. Even if they had been mRNA vaccinated within the exact same time frame.
Worse still, Mr Y will not only be fraudulently labelled as a Covid-19 death; he will also enter the government’s statistical database as being unvaccinated, even though the vaccine may well have killed him. In turn, the government and the health agencies will use his “unvaccinated” death to encourage people to take the vaccine against Covid-19 death……
So simple. So wicked. So criminal. So obvious once your eyes are opened to the fraud.